|
Nanoparticle type
|
Applications
|
|
Alumino silicate nano particles
|
It can be used to reduce bleeding in trauma
patients with external wounds by activating the blood clotting mechanism,
causing blood in a wound to clot quickly. Z-Medica is producing a medical
gauze that uses aluminosilicate nano particles for use on external wounds. For
trauma patients with internal bleeding another way to reduce the blood loss
is needed.
Also the researchers at Chase Western Reserve University are developing polymer
nanoparticles that act as synthetic platelets. Lab tests have shown that injection of these synthetic platelets
significantly reduces blood loss.
|
|
Polyethylene glycol-hydrophilic carbon clusters
(PEG-HCC)
|
They have been shown to absorb
free radicals at a much higher
rate than the proteins out body uses for this function. This ability to
absorb free radicals may reduce the harm that is caused by the release of
free radicals after a brain injury.
|
|
Iron oxide nano particles
|
It can be used to improve MRI images of cancer tumours.
The nanoparticle is coated with a peptide that binds to a cancer tumour, once
the nanoparticles are attached to the tumour the magnetic property of the iron oxide enhances the images from the Magnetic
Resonance Imagining scan.
|
|
Gold nano particles
|
A method being developed to fight skin cancer
uses gold nanoparticles to which RNA molecules are attached. The
nanoparticles are in an ointment that is applied to the skin. The nanoparticles
penetrate the skin and the RNA attaches to a cancer related gene, stopping the gene from generating proteins that are used in the
growth of skin cancer tumours.
|
|
Gold nano particles
embedded in a porous manganese oxide
|
Using gold nanoparticles embedded in a porous manganese oxide as a room
temperature catalyst to breakdown volatile organic compounds in air.
|
|
A layer of closely spaced palladium
nanoparticles that detect
hydrogen. When hydrogen is absorbed the palladium nanoparticles swell, causing shorts between nanoparticles which lowers the resistance of
the palladium layer.
|
|
|
Quantum Dots (crystalline
nano particles)
|
Quantum Dots (crystalline
nanoparticles) that identify the location of cancer cells in the body.
|
|
Gold nano particles with organic molecules
|
Combining gold nanoparticles with organic
molecules to create a transistor known as a NOMFET (Nanoparticle Organic Memory Field-Effect Transistor).
|
|
Iron nano particles
|
Iron nanoparticles used to
clean up carbon tetrachloride pollution in ground water.
|
|
Silicon
nano particles coating
|
Silicon nanoparticles coating anodes of
lithium-ion batteries to increase battery power and reduce recharge time.
|
|
Gold nano particles
|
Gold nanoparticles that allow
heat from infrared lasers to be targeted on cancer tumours.
|
|
Silicate nano particles
|
Silicate nanoparticles
used to provide a barrier to gasses (for example oxygen), or moisture in a
plastic film used for packaging. This could reduce the possibly of food
spoiling or drying out.
|
|
Zinc oxide nano particles
|
Zinc oxide nano particles
dispersed in industrial coatings to protect wood, plastic and textiles from
exposure to UV rays.
|
|
Silicon dioxide
crystalline nano particles
|
Silicon dioxide crystalline nano particles
filling gaps between carbon fibres strengthen tennis racquets.
|
|
Silver nano particles
|
Silver nano particles
in fabric that kills bacteria making clothing odour-resistant.
|
|
Porous silica
Nano particles used to deliver chemotherapy
drugs to cancer cells.
|
Porous silica nano particles
used to deliver chemotherapy drugs to cancer cells.
|
|
Semiconductor
nano particles
|
Semiconductor nano particles applied in
a low temperature printing process that results in low cost solar cells.
|
|
Iron oxide nano particles
|
Iron oxide nano particles used to clean arsenic from water
wells.
|
|
|
Nano particles, when activated
by x-rays, that generate electrons that cause the
destruction of cancer cells to which they have attached themselves. This is
intended to be used in place radiation therapy with much less damage to
healthy tissue.
|
|
|
A nano particle cream that releases
nitric oxide gas to fight staph
infections.
|
|
Gold-palladium
|
That
can replace expensive and potentially toxic reagents that promote oxidation
of aromatic primary alcohols to aldehydes, which is one of the crucial
processes in the perfume production.
|
Showing posts with label application. Show all posts
Showing posts with label application. Show all posts
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
DIFFERENT NANO PARTICLES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PHOTOMULTIPLIER (PMT) & CHARGED COUPLED DEVICE (CCD) DETECTORS
Some of the most common differences between Photo multiplier (PMT) detectors & Charged Coupled Device detector (CCDs)..
1. Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and Charged coupled devices (CCDs) both give spectra. The difference is the PMT is used with a small slit in front of it to control the bandwidth of light being detected. The CCD takes advantage of the dispersed light fully. The pixel columns will each correspond to a wavelength (resolution and range depend on the grating used). A PMT requires scanning of the Monochromator to collect a spectra. The CCD takes a single snap shot and you have a spectrum. The CCD sensitivity and dynamic range is lower than a PMT.
2. A photomultiplier tube is a detection device that is made from a glass vacuum tube with a series of metal plate electrodes. A CCD is a solid state detector made from semiconductor materials.
3. The main difference is one of sensitivity. Generally speaking the better the spectral resolution of the instrument the lower the amount of light reaching the detector and so you need more sensitivity in your detector. A PMT measures a single point in the spectrum at a time whereas with a CCD the complete spectrum is imaged across the CCD and so can be measured all at the same time.
4. An instrument with a CCD is usually much faster and cheaper but will not have as good a spectral resolution (the ability to resolve absorbance peaks very close to each other).
5. CCDs and photomultipliers vary in a number of aspects. One difference is gain, a photomultiplier has gain whereas a CCD does not (hence the multiplier bit of PMT). The PMT gain may be up to 10,000,000 and is available at high speeds and for large area detectors, which means that one can usually get close to the theoretical noise floor. On the other hand, PMTs have poor quantum efficiency compared to CCDs (25% typ against 85% typ) so you can sometimes get better performance with a CCD if you can go slowly enough.
6. PMTs are also typically single channel devices, although 16 channel linear arrays are available. CCDs are usually linear or 2D arrays.
7. In a dispersive spectrometer a linear CCD array can capture the entire spectrum in one measurement. A single channel PMT must have the spectrum scanned across it sequentially to produce the entire spectrum.
8. PMT's are typically preferable to CCD's on spectroscopic application for several reasons. The ability to adjust the gain of each PMT allows a manufacturer to adjust the response of each PMT to the specific signal being measured, so every element you are trying to detect can be analyzed at optimum conditions. Solid state CCD's are a compromise. Every element detected has the same conditions, so most are compromised.
9. Also, PMT's can be heated and held at constant temperature (in well made instruments) to prevent drift caused by variation in temperature. If you try to heat a CCD, the noise level will go up, and the signal to noie ratio will degrade as a result. CCD's are sometimes cooled to try to improve their s/n ratio, but usually not cooled enough to really help much due to condensation issues that arise.
10. A third advantage of PMT's is that they can be used in a vacuum chamber without long term degradation for decades of use. The surface of a CCD will degrade under vacuum over a few (8-15) years. Most manufacturers making CCD based instruments opt for a Nitrogen or Argon flush, rather than vacuum to displace the oxygen from the detector chamber. This method results in decreased performance compared to PMT's, and is used in lower performance less expensive spectrometers.
Some of the most common differences between Photo multiplier (PMT) detectors & Charged Coupled Device detector (CCDs)..
1. Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and Charged coupled devices (CCDs) both give spectra. The difference is the PMT is used with a small slit in front of it to control the bandwidth of light being detected. The CCD takes advantage of the dispersed light fully. The pixel columns will each correspond to a wavelength (resolution and range depend on the grating used). A PMT requires scanning of the Monochromator to collect a spectra. The CCD takes a single snap shot and you have a spectrum. The CCD sensitivity and dynamic range is lower than a PMT.
2. A photomultiplier tube is a detection device that is made from a glass vacuum tube with a series of metal plate electrodes. A CCD is a solid state detector made from semiconductor materials.
3. The main difference is one of sensitivity. Generally speaking the better the spectral resolution of the instrument the lower the amount of light reaching the detector and so you need more sensitivity in your detector. A PMT measures a single point in the spectrum at a time whereas with a CCD the complete spectrum is imaged across the CCD and so can be measured all at the same time.
4. An instrument with a CCD is usually much faster and cheaper but will not have as good a spectral resolution (the ability to resolve absorbance peaks very close to each other).
5. CCDs and photomultipliers vary in a number of aspects. One difference is gain, a photomultiplier has gain whereas a CCD does not (hence the multiplier bit of PMT). The PMT gain may be up to 10,000,000 and is available at high speeds and for large area detectors, which means that one can usually get close to the theoretical noise floor. On the other hand, PMTs have poor quantum efficiency compared to CCDs (25% typ against 85% typ) so you can sometimes get better performance with a CCD if you can go slowly enough.
6. PMTs are also typically single channel devices, although 16 channel linear arrays are available. CCDs are usually linear or 2D arrays.
7. In a dispersive spectrometer a linear CCD array can capture the entire spectrum in one measurement. A single channel PMT must have the spectrum scanned across it sequentially to produce the entire spectrum.
8. PMT's are typically preferable to CCD's on spectroscopic application for several reasons. The ability to adjust the gain of each PMT allows a manufacturer to adjust the response of each PMT to the specific signal being measured, so every element you are trying to detect can be analyzed at optimum conditions. Solid state CCD's are a compromise. Every element detected has the same conditions, so most are compromised.
9. Also, PMT's can be heated and held at constant temperature (in well made instruments) to prevent drift caused by variation in temperature. If you try to heat a CCD, the noise level will go up, and the signal to noie ratio will degrade as a result. CCD's are sometimes cooled to try to improve their s/n ratio, but usually not cooled enough to really help much due to condensation issues that arise.
10. A third advantage of PMT's is that they can be used in a vacuum chamber without long term degradation for decades of use. The surface of a CCD will degrade under vacuum over a few (8-15) years. Most manufacturers making CCD based instruments opt for a Nitrogen or Argon flush, rather than vacuum to displace the oxygen from the detector chamber. This method results in decreased performance compared to PMT's, and is used in lower performance less expensive spectrometers.
1. Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and Charged coupled devices (CCDs) both give spectra. The difference is the PMT is used with a small slit in front of it to control the bandwidth of light being detected. The CCD takes advantage of the dispersed light fully. The pixel columns will each correspond to a wavelength (resolution and range depend on the grating used). A PMT requires scanning of the Monochromator to collect a spectra. The CCD takes a single snap shot and you have a spectrum. The CCD sensitivity and dynamic range is lower than a PMT.
2. A photomultiplier tube is a detection device that is made from a glass vacuum tube with a series of metal plate electrodes. A CCD is a solid state detector made from semiconductor materials.
3. The main difference is one of sensitivity. Generally speaking the better the spectral resolution of the instrument the lower the amount of light reaching the detector and so you need more sensitivity in your detector. A PMT measures a single point in the spectrum at a time whereas with a CCD the complete spectrum is imaged across the CCD and so can be measured all at the same time.
4. An instrument with a CCD is usually much faster and cheaper but will not have as good a spectral resolution (the ability to resolve absorbance peaks very close to each other).
5. CCDs and photomultipliers vary in a number of aspects. One difference is gain, a photomultiplier has gain whereas a CCD does not (hence the multiplier bit of PMT). The PMT gain may be up to 10,000,000 and is available at high speeds and for large area detectors, which means that one can usually get close to the theoretical noise floor. On the other hand, PMTs have poor quantum efficiency compared to CCDs (25% typ against 85% typ) so you can sometimes get better performance with a CCD if you can go slowly enough.
6. PMTs are also typically single channel devices, although 16 channel linear arrays are available. CCDs are usually linear or 2D arrays.
7. In a dispersive spectrometer a linear CCD array can capture the entire spectrum in one measurement. A single channel PMT must have the spectrum scanned across it sequentially to produce the entire spectrum.
8. PMT's are typically preferable to CCD's on spectroscopic application for several reasons. The ability to adjust the gain of each PMT allows a manufacturer to adjust the response of each PMT to the specific signal being measured, so every element you are trying to detect can be analyzed at optimum conditions. Solid state CCD's are a compromise. Every element detected has the same conditions, so most are compromised.
9. Also, PMT's can be heated and held at constant temperature (in well made instruments) to prevent drift caused by variation in temperature. If you try to heat a CCD, the noise level will go up, and the signal to noie ratio will degrade as a result. CCD's are sometimes cooled to try to improve their s/n ratio, but usually not cooled enough to really help much due to condensation issues that arise.
10. A third advantage of PMT's is that they can be used in a vacuum chamber without long term degradation for decades of use. The surface of a CCD will degrade under vacuum over a few (8-15) years. Most manufacturers making CCD based instruments opt for a Nitrogen or Argon flush, rather than vacuum to displace the oxygen from the detector chamber. This method results in decreased performance compared to PMT's, and is used in lower performance less expensive spectrometers.
Monday, 9 February 2015
LASER INDUCED BREAKDOWN SPECTROSCOPY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)