INTRODUCTION
Total reflection x-ray fluorescence (TXRF) analysis is a powerful analytical tool with respect to detectable elemental range, simplicity of quantification and detection limits. This includes the capacity to detect almost all elements of the periodic system, namely from boron to uranium. Even the highest-Z elements of the actinides can be detected. Quantitatively, the dynamic range covers several orders of magnitude, so ultra-trace element levels to major elemental concentrations can be determined. In terms of detection limits, the levels of femtogram absolute detectable masses under optimized excitation–detection conditions can be reached. Some of these features can be topped with additional properties such as rapid analysis time of a few seconds and simultaneous detection of the elements present. In some applications, non-destructiveness is of importance, e.g. while dealing with precious substances of cultural values from fine arts or also in cases of forensic investigations if only small amounts of sample are available. TXRF is an energy-dispersive XRF (EDXRF) technique, and excitation geometry with angles below the critical angle of total reflection is perfectly suited for these investigations.
The above statements emphasize the analytical power, and in addition to these arguments one can add the large number of applications that has led to the revival of x-ray fluorescence analysis for ultra-trace element analysis. The applications range from the interesting fields of medicine, techniques and environment to forensic, fine arts, extra-terrestrial samples and fundamental research. With new physical and technical ideas leading to modifications of the physical properties of the primary radiation, e.g. monoenergetic, linearly polarized, highly intense, or on the detector side high resolution, high counting capacity, large area or even arrays of detectors, new perspectives are opening up for TXRF
In Fig. 1 the experimental set-up of conventional EDXRF and TXRF is schematically shown. As TXRF is basically an energy-dispersive analytical technique, the main difference to conventional EDXRF is neither the source nor the detector but the geometry of excitation at small incidence angles below the critical angle of total reflection.
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 1 Comparison between conventional (left) and total
reflection mode of excitation (right).
THEORY
The theory of x-ray total reflection is based on the phenomenon that at
an incident angle below the critical angle the narrow collimated primary beam
is totally reflected. A beam gets reflected from a flat polished surface of any
material at the same angle as the incident one and has almost the same
intensity as the primary beam (total intensity is reflected), except for a
small portion that is refracted and penetrates the reflecting medium. This
evanescent wave loses intensity exponentially as it penetrates deeper into the medium.
In Fig. 2, the fundamental formalism of x-ray total reflection is shown, based
on the Fresnel formalism and the complex index of refraction for x-rays, which
is given below. The index of refraction for x-rays differs only slightly from 1,
which is described theoretically by the value of υ which
is in the range of 10-5
. For many materials the angles involved are small, typically a few milli
radians or a tenth of a degree.
Applications
to chemical analysis:
The
incident radiation in TXRF is a fine, collimated, almost parallel beam with
typical dimensions of 8 mm width and only 50 μm height. This narrow
beam impinges at an angle below the critical angle of total reflection (1.8
mrad or 0.1 degrees in the case of a monoenergetic Mo K˛ radiation and Si reflector) on the surface
of a flat polished material. that serves as the sample carrier. In the case of
chemical analysis of different samples, such as from the environment, medicine
or technical products, different procedures apply. The sample has to be
transferred into the liquid form by chemical digestion procedures. A small
volume of 1–20 μl of the dissolved sample is taken using a pipette. The acidic
or aqueous solution is dropped at the center of the reflector and dried by
infrared heating, on a hot plate or in vacuum.
Possible
applications of TXRF.
Sample
preparation
The
samples can be from many scientific disciplines and thus the physical state
will be different. The best-suited samples for TXRF are in the liquid
state—either in the form of aqueous or acidic solutions—so if solids or powders
are to be analysed, these samples must be transferred into the liquid state.
The presented procedures are typical but can of course be adapted to the sample
type, and the world of chemistry is fully open to new ideas, given in detail in
the respective literature. Sample preparation has been discussed by several
authors and many publications deal with special methods. Even so, the complex
subject leaves a lot of ideas open to get the sample prepared in a way that the
elements present can be detected even if they are at the lowest concentrations.
Pre-concentration methods or selective enrichment techniques by chelation or electrochemical
methods can be introduced to ensure that adequate masses are present on the
sample reflector in the range of absolute picograms from very low-concentration
samples, e.g. sea water in which the salt extraction also is an important
preparation step. Recently, the collection of fine dust and also aerosols directly
on the sample carrier in a short time of a few minutes to several hours by
multi-stage samplers and the direct analysis of the minute masses collected by
TXRF were successfully proven in large-scale experimental series in different
parts of the world at locations of interest.
INSTRUMENTATION
IN TXRF
Various
combinations of x-ray sources, spectral modification elements, reflector
materials and detectors can be used to optimize excitation and detection
conditions. Measurements can be performed in air, in a He atmosphere or in a vacuum
chamber. Vacuum conditions are mandatory for the detection of light elements to
avoid absorption, but it is also advantageous because the scattering of primary
x-rays from air is avoided. The components of a TXRF spectrometer are shown in the below figure
Sources
of x-rays for TXRF are mainly x-ray tubes, ranging from low power (50–75W) to
high-power standing anodes of up to 3000W and finally rotating anodes up to 18
kW. The appropriate focus is a line focus with dimensions 8 or 12mm long and 40
μm
wide. Everything is done to get a high flux of photons onto the sample. There
is radiation from the ultimate source with best properties of having a naturally
collimated beam characteristic, an extremely high flux and a linearly polarized
beam—the SR. Even though it is difficult to get access to SR, the results
achievable show the importance of this effective combination of the source and
TXRF, from which ultimate low detection limits of a few femtogram have been
achieved.
The beam from an x-ray tube is unpolarised and has a continuous spectral
distribution of the characteristic radiation. In many cases, a monoenergetic
excitation is the preferred one because the background is optimally low as only
scattered photons of single energy are present and will appear as two lines
elastically and Compton-scattered in the spectrum. The first low-cost approach
to modify the spectrum was an optical flat in the beam path and taking advantage
of the energy dependence of the critical angle to suppress the high-energy part
of the bremsstrahlung spectrum. This leads to reduced background, in particular
in the low-energy region, as the Compton edge produced by the backscattered
high-energy photons disappears. Versions with two reflectors attached
togetherwith a spacing of 50 mm lead to a double-reflector monochromator. Efficient monochromators are
nowadays available using multilayers with reflectivities in the range of up to
80% of the characteristic radiation of the anode material of choice. Typically
in use are combinations of layered structures made of W–C, Ni–C andMo–Si with a
d spacing of 2–3 nm. Thus, they are adjusted to
fulfill the Bragg equation and the full spectrum
is modified to be monoenergetic. Using modern technology to bend these
structures, it is possible to design x-ray optical components that focus the
beam with a small divergence, thereby increasing the flux of photons in the focal
spot which is designed to be at the sample position. The result is an increase
in intensity on the sample several times more than that with the non-focussing
flat multilayer. These optical components are commercially available and can be
inserted in the beam path of the TXRF spectrometer to improve further detection
limits.
Quantitative
TXRF
The
conversion of the measured intensities into concentrations is one of the most
important steps in analytical XRF. In the special case of TXRF, the
complications are rather completely removed, as the approach for the thin-film
sample can be applied, which leads to a simple and linear relation between the
intensity, I, and concentration, C, of
the element considered. The addition of an internal standard with known concentration
leads to a simple quantification procedure, as follows:
Advantages of TXRF
|
